Forums are constantly bombarded by people who fit their barges for yield over tank, then come here to cry about how a single catalyst did violence on their boats. This particular bad idea of yours will only do two things:

1: Cause more people to prioritize yield over tank, thus losing their ship and shiptoasting on forums about the "problem with ganking.
2: Cause more minerals to be available on market, thus driving the prices down further. This would have the effect of your income from mining remaining the same, and possibly dropping if enough people used the feature.

Basic rule of economics. If you increase supply, in this case by increasing yield, without a corresponding increase in demand, prices drop. When prices drop, the supplier makes less money.

So, not supported by me. Should not be supported by any miner with a grasp on basic economics. If you want a long term reduction in your income through mining, then by all means keep supporting this bad idea.

You'll only ever have range issues when you have 10+ hulks mining the same belt faster than they can move along it.

Suggest you learn more about how the game really works before you promote suggestions that, while you think are helpful, actually make things worse in the long run.

This put miners so much at rish in highsec, besides the fact that hulk and mackinaw are pretty juicy targets by themselves, that I dont see how a mode that remove the pretty meh defenses we have on mackinaw and hulk (skiff is another story) would make miners want to do this at any given time. For remote and deep area of nullsec yes (if guarded against npc by combat ships that is), but these people have been recently already buffed with the ore anomalies tweaks.

Why not make just a mode that lock us (exhumer only) in place for 5/10 minutes (with a 1/2 min unlock time for example) and give a big bonus (let's say half the size of a highsec semi-circular belt) to range (with not or very little bonus (5-10%) to cycle time) ? More range is not needed for mining fleet, because the orca give a big bonus to range already, but a solo/small team of miners could like this way more.

Ok, I already prepare bookmarks for my belts to be able to warp/move and always stay and range and aligned to a celestial/safespot. But if that range is not a real bonus, I don't see any other way to make the OP idea viable without breaking the market. Guess it's not possible then to make overheat of mining modules a meaningfull choice.

This seems to be a refrain. The burden of communication falls most heavily on the speaker or poster to be clear, concise and unambigous. Telling everyone who reads it differently than you intended that they need to re-read the thread, or that they have misunderstood the thread, etc. probably means you need to clarify the idea, and provide examples of exactly how your idea should work in a live environment. That you see half or more of people who attempt to engage in the discussion misunderstand you should be sending up alarm bells that you aren't communicating effectively.

I'd love to see you clearly elaborate your ideas, because I like many of the core concepts. I would like to like your ideas, but because they are either unclear, or because you try to railroad a single interpretation of ambiguous phrases without clarifying which way it is meant to work. I can't. The dismissal of disagreeing statements, or people who read what you wrote without a direct tap into your intentions, in fact, makes it nearly impossible.

without a direct tap into your intentions, in fact, makes it nearly impossible.